ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has greatly disturbed healthcare and the practice of neurosurgery. As healthcare systems evolve in the face of COVID-19, the use of telehealth platforms has expanded. We present the results of a large survey of patient perspectives on the role of telehealth in the care of spine clinic patients. METHODS: All patients at the spine clinic of a large, tertiary, academic medical center were surveyed at their clinic visit from 5/30/20-6/30/20. All responses were anonymous and results were analyzed with standard statistical techniques. RESULTS: 176 surveys were returned and 164 were entirely completed. 56.8% of patients were new while 24.4% were post-operative follow-up visits. 54.9% had lumbar symptoms. 85% had pain while more than half also reported weakness. 58% traveled greater than twenty-five miles for their appointment. 96% had transportation readily available. Of all respondents, only 15.3% preferred the appointment via video telehealth while 4% had no preference between in-person appointment or virtual visit. Preference for telehealth appointment was not associated with factors such as new or established in the practice, spinal region of symptoms, pain, weakness, comfort with technology, age or duration of symptoms. There was a significant difference between how far the patient traveled for the clinic appointment and their preference for a telehealth appointment, with patients traveling further distances favoring telehealth (p=0.04). This effect remained significant when stratifying based on 25 miles (p=0.03) or 50 miles (p=0.03) but not when stratifying based on 100 miles (p=0.32). However, the sample size of patients traveling >100 miles was small, limiting any inference regarding that subgroup. Access to transportation was associated with preference for telehealth (88.89% vs. 97.18%, p=0.08) but did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Most spine patients prefer in-person clinic appointments to virtual appointments. These preferences should be considered when arranging patient encounters.
ABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: COVID-19 patients frequently experience headaches, malaise, and fatigue. For patients with shunted hydrocephalus, these signs and symptoms can often be indicative of shunt failure. Thus, it can be challenging to determine if shunt failure has occurred in this patient population. Therefore, we explored the question of how a diagnosis of COVID-19 in shunted hydrocephalus patients influences the rate of shunt revision. METHODS: We used a deidentified database network (TriNetX) to gather information on patients with shunted hydrocephalus and COVID-19 versus no COVID-19 from January 20, 2020, through September 26, 2021. Our primary outcome of interest was shunt revision at 90 days, with secondary outcomes of mortality, hospitalization, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, tracheostomy, PEG tube placement, fall, seizure, acute kidney injury (AKI), venous thromboembolism (VTE), ischemic stroke (I.S.), myocardial infarction (MI), and sepsis. Cohorts were propensity score-matched for common comorbidities and demographics. RESULTS: After propensity score matching, 10,600 patients with shunted hydrocephalus and COVID-19 (cohort 1) and 10,600 patients with shunted hydrocephalus and no COVID-19 (cohort 2) were identified. Average age was 38.5 years. Eight hundred and thirty-four patients (7.869%) in cohort 1 and 180 (1.698%) patients in cohort 2 underwent shunt revision (p=<0.0001, OR 4.978, 95% CI 4.198, 5.821). Mortality was 4.642% vs. 2.113% (p<0.0001, OR 2.255, 95% CI 1.921, 2.647). Hospitalization rates were 27.72% vs. 10.303% (p<0.0001), and ICU admission rates 11.567% vs. 3.463% (p<0.0001). Ventilator dependence was 3.529% vs. 0.953% (p<0.0001), tracheostomy 1.142% vs. 0.236% (p<0.0001), PEG tube insertion 2.472% vs. 0.585% (p<0.0001), falls 2.321% vs. 1.076% (p<0.0001), seizure 11.369% vs. 5.953% (p<0.0001), AKI 4.416% vs. 1.717% (p<0.0001), VTE 3.538% vs. 1.293% (p<0.0001), sepsis 3.887% vs. 1.179% (p<0.0001), IS 0.585% vs. 0.16% (p<0.0001), and MI 1.34% vs. 0.519% (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: COVID-19 infection is associated with an almost five-fold increase in shunt revisions.